Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Carragher who wrote (33391)	3/8/2004 11:46:06 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793854

Sometimes you need to go further to determine an agenda when they are identified with a liberal or conservative think tank. Sure, which further complicates Gina's issue. I mean do we really want to take up three parenthetical paragraphs for each affiliation of each person referenced in each news article so we can find out where they're coming from? That's too cumbersome. Simple characterizations like "conservative" are provocative to some. And no reference at all annoys Gina. So what to do... Personally, I think we should understand the difficulties of all of this and cut them some slack unless they blatantly misrepresent, but that's just me. I think this flap about the flap over the WTC in the Bush promos is way overdone. News media are always looking for the criticism. Sells papers. Always has and always will. Doesn't mean they're biased against Bush. No way will the news ever report than anyone's ads were "well received" or "provoked no comment." Never happen.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next