At last we finally see where TAW got these irrelevant statistics!
"Square miles of land 'won' "????????
Geeze... you'd think someone had changed the Constitution to allow all the deserts and TUNDRA to vote, instead of failable PEOPLE!
If you could only squeeze the snow in Alaska, or the sand in Nevada, hard enough to hear the dirt clods --- faintly, ever so faintly --- express their preference in elections, and designate which ballot options they supported... why, then we could get rid of PEOPLE altogether! LOL!!!!!!!!!
You crack me up!
(And, PS, shouldn't you take the great States of Alaska and Wyoming off of the good professor's list of "lands owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country" and move them over to the list that includes "those citizens living ...off government welfare" --- since they are able to actually dispense with State taxes because they live off of the fees extracted from companies who mine the rich public and private mineral lands? If THAT AIN'T living off of the government teat, I don't know what is.)
I guess citizens who live in cities are just S.O.L. because they don't have the great good fortune to live on top of a pool of the public's oil, or coal, or gold, or what-have-you.
Ha! (Just where the hell is that giant of educational progress, "Hamline University" anyway?)
Gee... don't forget the relative 'number of prarie dogs' in the Red States and in the Blue States either... or the amount of crab grass, or the number of acres of scrub brush that each citizen can lay claim to --- I'm sure all that stuff is REAL IMPORTANT when it comes to deciding elections....
(How about deciding elections by the aggregate SAT scores of the citizens? Geeze, you crack me up!) |
