SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Labrador who wrote (114)3/8/2004 9:40:20 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (6) of 165
 
If -- big if for me -- just because 12 jurors was convinced, doesn't give me comfort -- if she did lie -- she lied about a non-crime. It is not a crime for her to have sold her shares just because she knew Waskal was selling. It is not a crime. A lot of people don't understand that point.

If she knew that the FDA had declined or delayed approval of Erbitux and she tried to sell before that became public knowledge -- that would be a crime.

Martha was convicted of lying about a non-crime. It's BS no matter how you cut it. She must have pissed off someone important along the way ...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News