COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

0.0%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3846)	8/17/1997 6:16:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	of 22053

I have spoken often here of the Bradley Siderograph. It has been very, very RIGHT since February at least. You may laugh, but right is still right. Anything that works. It has now generated a sell signal, having been in bullish mode since the middle of April. Janice, I did know what you meant by the Bradley Siderograph. It likely has been correct but I am a skeptic. You have a point since it has been working. As for the terrifying Marubozu of Yin, see: I will read your link. Yes, the premium was actually 6 1/8 at the time, incredible. But no, these poopy people at my brokerage WILL NOT let mere mortals (as opposed to institutions) write index options I am permited and do write index options. Some brokerage houses are more conservative than others. The large problem is the equity necessary to hold a position. Was 10,000 contracts the limit one may have on a certain side of that index option? If I recall correctly, the NWX limit is 9,000 contracts on one side. I cannot even imagine a large institution writing that many contracts on a 300+ index much less a 1000 index. Glenn

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next