SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.91+0.9%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (116817)3/10/2004 5:26:11 PM
From: ptannerRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Joe, re: "The transfer rate is nothing to write home about, and must be limited by ATA 100 interface."

Looking at the product's home page the 100MB/s (the interface limit) is the burst speed while sustained is a more modest 40MB/s -- marketing just like HD. I wonder how the burst is considerably higher? Cache?

m-systems.com

But your point about the width being variable so they could achieve higher throughputs makes sense. But they seem to have not yet reached the limit of the present interface wrt bandwidth -- but the latency is nice relative to conventional drives. We need a review of one of these from StorageReview. :)

I always smile at the potential to transfer at ATA133 from that 2MB of cache on a HD before the speed drops. ;) When available it _is_ nice but the HD tasks I notice are of the GB variety.

-PT
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext