SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (18467)3/11/2004 11:53:31 PM
From: GraceZRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
Let me spell it out for you. The Chinese don't care if their wireless standard is better or worse, or even completely useless.

Now who is blinded by their own prejudices?

What they care about is Intel can't implement this on their own. Intel would have to work closely with a Chinese partner in order integrate the technology on Intel's chips.

True, they wish to protect their own industries and not lose control of the technology standard to a foreign company. They don't have the lead, so they'd like to trash ours. Problem is they are just as clueless as you are as to how one gets and keeps the technological lead, so they are reduced to stealing and threatening.

Luckily the people who run Intel are way ahead of you on this.

Actually I'm on the same page with Intel. I agree with what they did. What I disagree with is how the Chinese are acting. Where did I not make that clear?

Wait till you see the successor to the Cherry.

So if you copy someone's design that gives you the where-with-all to surpass them? Maybe so, I'm beginning to think I live in a country with a bunch of idiots who have as little idea about how innovation works as the PRC.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext