I oppose all killing. All means all.
This is such a bizarre, foreign, incomprehensible idea to you, not only do you reject it, you can't even acknowledge that I believe it. Even though I labelled Saddam as a war criminal in my post, and you even re-posted what I said, you still assume I must be pro-Saddam if I am anti-Bush. You still assume, if I oppose Bush's program of killing, the only other possible choice, is supporting Saddam's and OBL's programs of killing.
Bush and Saddam are both men who consistently solve problems by killing people. Saddam is still proud of gassing the Kurds. Bush is still proud of gassing more prisoners than any other Governor, ever. Killing is all they know.
After a nuclear bomb is used against an American city (that's where Bush's methods are leading to), people like you will support the labelling of pacifists as illegal combatants, and jailing them. It will become a crime, perhaps a capital crime, to advocate solving problems by the methods proposed in the Sermon On The Mount. |
