<I find it completely remarkable that you haven't mentioned Ariel Sharon. To many of observers Sharon appears to be the greatest terrorist in the region.>
I don’t like Sharon the reasons I don’t go after him are following;
1- Unlike Saddam, Gaddafi and Assad he represents the only true democracy in the Middle East, the democracy has a tendency to flout Palestinians rights and people their is a way out for it, in today’s polls his popularity rating is down to 33 percent, none of the Arab leaders give this right to their own people.
2- Sharon has committed crimes in Shitla camp and many other inhuman atrocities but he has not gassed his own people, your comparison is again very weak, all these people in Hama and Halebja killed their own citizens, for me someone who is a protector of his nation becomes an enemy of state is a biggest criminal, he is elected to defend his people and he does that job, the other crooks send people with one way ticket to death through so called martyrdom suicide bombing, they pay for these suicide missions, you call it fight for freedom I call it fight that leads to maiming of the entire Palestinian nation, using them for last fifty years as a cannot fodder of the blunders this collective Arab leadership has made.
3- If inclusion of Sharon satisfies you in any way I am more than happy to reach out to your suggestion by including him but does that not reduces the intensity of my remarks that these tyrants who have muzzled hundred of millions of Arabs, those who do not have freedom to lambaste their Presidents like you do so often need a reprieve from these lunatics, I would like to see millions of Raymond Durray all around, Bush is making that possible in our region and in the Middle East.
4- It is not important what I have included or failed to include it is more important to accept the validity of the claim that these are tyrants and removal of these people help humanity progress in attaining its ideals to become prosperous and more equitable, what is good for you Raymond is good for others, I hate to see when tongues are slashed for speaking against any of these luminaries that you tend to defend from wrath of times.
<43 million of his own citizens live with the terror that they have no health insurance and if they are struck by a catastrophic illness, they may well be helped by the medical profession, but at the cost of personal bankruptcy. >
This is a problem that exists and it was their pre Bush Jr. too, Mrs Clinton health reforms aimed at inclusions of all these people within a greater set, however countries like France and UK where NHS exists in one way or the other and where cradle to grave protection exists the level of a litre of gasoline is equal to what you pay for a Gallon, the taxes are so high, the employment structural inabilities in France and Germany have made these nations nearly a socialists state, in free market economies injustice do exits but safe guards are their too, for me to blame Bush for 43 million uninsured Americans is travesty of justice, the system needs improvement and I think you should pay more for your commute and this free gas should now be reverted to taxes equal to Europe whereby everyone will have equal opportunity and more socialist basis of the society, I think that will suit you fine as a leftist liberal but that needs a new set of discussions. I don’t support leftist policies and as such would like the system to be inclusive but in a manner that provides more opportunity and more freedom of choice and action.
<Exxon and the other oil companies get the best shot at Libya's oil wealth?>
No one abuses oil or for that mater Libyan oil more than Gaddafi, the wealth parameter is a pyramid, cronies have all the wealth and poor Libyan has nothing, every Libyan should have 26 million dollars of assets this wealth is limited within
10, 000 families’ rest of them live very ordinary. |
