SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PartyTime who wrote (6059)3/14/2004 3:40:01 AM
From: Michelino  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
PartyTime,

I don't think Israel will find your strategy that appealing.

Consider if someone instead suggested:

"Why can't the United States give up all of its nukes in exchange for a non-aggression pact from all of its enemies?"

You might expect that Democrats and Republican would reject the idea immediately. For one thing, the plan does not presume unilateral disarmament...In the case of the USA, it begs the question, What about Russia and China's nukes?

Look at this another way... I think that Israel would at least ask, "what about Pakistan's weapons", who would in turn demand that India give up its WMDs who in turn might think that China should disarm who in turn might demand that Russia get in the act who would need the US and Europe to disarm before considering.

So unless, you could guarantee that this new domino theory of nuclear disarmament would go into effect, I don't believe that any nation that has working bombs would be interested.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext