Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (34392)	3/14/2004 3:13:18 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793912

Didn't you read this post? Message 19913371 In it, my first one on the subject, I remarked about Reuters liberal use of the word when quoting others. I also noted that I found ordinary usages of the word, written by the journalist. What I provided in my most recent post were examples of the ordinary usage, not quotes. It is only in a piece of theirs when it is a quote from someone. So the word, terrorist, in each of my offerings was written in disappearing quote pixels? You didn't dig enough. Just where would you have me look for those missing quotes? Are you saying that the Reuters policy is such that the word is OK as long as that's the word the subject of the article would have used had he been quoted rather than just reported on?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next