Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (126222)	3/15/2004 1:48:28 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<<<perhaps we should not have attacked Iraq...It's quite clear now that there was NOT 'an imminent threat'..>>> What has Iraq got to do with the Al Queda?. Some have said our attack on Iraq has diverted efforts from the war on terror, saying Saddam had no connection with Al Queda. But facts being collected are beginning to prove otherwise,- indicating there were training camps in Iraq. And if there were camps, their inhabitants plans would represent an imminent threat. But this nit picking. Somebody wants the US out of the ME -period Its not Saudi Arabia- they need our people to build and maintain their oil industry- they just dont want troops on their soil to attract terrorists Its not Kuwait , nor Qutar, nor Turkey Its not the Iraqi governing council Palestinians dont count- they dont have a country, refuse to accept what was offered by any treaty to date. Makes me curious whether a majority of ME countries would be in favor of the US staying, or of leaving, when Iraq is up and running by itself and our military presence is reduced. Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next