SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: greenspirit who wrote (126225)3/15/2004 2:01:01 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
re: didn't you support our *killing* in Afghanistan?

I make three basic divisions, among those who worship and follow the God of:

1. Jesus (love your enemy)(also Lao Tsu, Buddha)
2. Moses (eye for an eye)(also Mohammed, Confucius)
3. Joshua (kill them all)(also innumerable other tribal war gods)

I try to follow #1 (no examples here, as nobody practices it).

I will not criticize those who follow #2 (overthrowing the Taliban, after the WTC attack).

I will label as evil, the worship of #3 (overthrowing the Iraqi government, when they had not attacked us, and did not even have the capability of threatening our national security).

What label people apply to themselves, has little relation to which of the above Gods they actually follow. For instance, most Muslims seem to follow #2 or #3, even though the message of Mohammed is entirely #2. Likewise, the message of Christ is entirely #1, yet those who call themselves Christians, mostly practice #2 or #3. That is, the practice of the world's 1.2B Muslims, compared to the practice of the world's 2B Christians (and all their governments), is indistinguishable.

The eventual goal, is for everyone to worship God #1. But, for now, it would be a great improvement, and a more practical goal, to convince the Joshua-worshippers to abandon their doctrine of unlimited aggression, and wage only defensive wars. (As always, I mean the dictionary definition of "defensive", not the elastic stretch-to-cover-anything Orwellian definition which is so popular with militarists.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext