so where is the evidence that he can get bipartisan action within the Senate?
Can you claim Bush has. he is the greatest polarizer. So why look at Kerry's record in isolation?
here is man ready to exert dymanic bipartisan leadership with innovative programs to get the country moving in a new direction? If so, show me. I, frankly, didn't find it.
Again it is Bush's performance that we Americans are interested in. Not Kerry's. It is Bush who wants to get re elected. besides, Bush did not have much of a record coming in. The American voter knew that and did not vote for him. It is the 5 Supreme court justices who put him there.
There are lots more resolutions, none of them of any signifcance to the country as far as I could tell, though I admit I timed out at one point.
Again Bush does not have anything to show for what he did on the economic front. What he did to prevent outsourcing etc. etc.
Lastly, I said he has more experience than Bush at this point in his career. Experience in the battlefield and a distinguished one, knows about the military from first hand experience than does Bush, Lt. Gov. prosecutor, a Senator. A soldier, executive experience (Lt. Gov.), legislative experience (Senator), experienced in laws of the land etc. What did Bush have. If you voted for him then, if you find Bush to be OK according to the standards you applied then, why would you change that standard now? |
