Flag Resources (FGR.A A) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nikole Wollerstein who wrote (4100)	3/17/2004 11:25:33 AM
From: RJ2	Read Replies (1) of 4269

Nikita, I'm finding that yesterdays update was very important and a prelude to further assay numbers. Its obvious at present many of the finance/mining analytical people are not versed in the importance of these red FLAGS that keep coming out constantly with positive numbers and grades. "The darn stuff is right under their noses and many are still running around oblivious to that outcome." I would ask that the investing public should start asking some serious questions of their investment firms before making any decision on investing with with those type of firms. It boils down to one word "objectivity". Lets see, a random 5 foot sample out of a 250 foot section of drill core 907 PPM Colbalt/ 739 PPM Nickel? 73.5 feet of half oz of gold per ton? 48 feet of 3.60% Copper? I'm not in mining but it looks alright? The stock price (.11Cdn.) makes absoltely no sense too the potential of this mineral find, well I hope it stays here for alittle while longer so I can clip afew more at this bargain basement price. Good Luck!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next