Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (35181)	3/18/2004 10:50:25 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) of 793656

No, c2. They wanted Aznar's party out, they got it out. No, Nadine, your line of thinking does not take into account the possibility that the PP might have won if it had handled the aftermath of the bombings differently. It's quite possible that AQ simply got lucky. It clearly could not have anticipated Aznar's botched handling of the incident. I would love to see some statistical analysis showing how many voters changed their minds because of Aznar's misstep as opposed to the number who changed their minds in order to "appease" AQ by forcing a change in the Government's stance on Iraq. Until I see it, I know for a fact that a substantial number, perhaps enough to change the results in a dead-heat election, changed their minds because of the handling of the incident. The Spanish are not going to appease AQ; they are going to hunt them down like dogs, just like the French and the Germans are doing. No, they're appeasers because they are still clinging to the notion that the terrorists are not their enemy, only the enemy of America & the Joooooooos. Seems to me that killing Germans in Tunisia (or was it Morocco?) and Spaniards disproves that point as does the botched plot to strike the Eiffel Tower.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next