SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GST who wrote (126672)3/20/2004 4:21:44 PM
From: NightOwl  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
"Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism," Clarke told CBS. "He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something."

Hmmmmmmmm...

Apparently it wasn't "outrageous" enough to forego getting that 30 year pension socked away and the book to the printers before sharing his "outrageous" news.

It seems it lacked sufficient force to merit a word to former Senator Rudman or Senator Bird in the summer of 2003 when they were considering the need for Homeland expenditures.

Just last month, former Senator Warren Rudman chaired a task force at the Council on Foreign Relations that examined investments in police, fire, and emergency medical teams. This blue ribbon panel included Nobel laureates, U.S. military leaders, former high-level government officials, and other senior experts, and was advised by former White House terrorism and cyber-security chief Richard Clarke. The results of their examination should shake this Congress from its homeland security slumber.
senate.gov

Nor to anyone in Congress before it granted authorization
for military action; and certainly not before the 3rd Inf Div was shipped out.

At least we know where Mr. Clarke places the value of democracy... relative to his bank account anyway. <Hoo><sigh><Hoo>

0|0
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext