China Warehouse- More Than Crockery Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : China Warehouse- More Than Crockery

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RealMuLan who wrote (2928)	3/21/2004 12:00:27 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (1) of 6370

The agreement should help China reduce its dependence on coal, substituting a clean fuel for a very dirty one. That of course was not the purpose of the article you cited in the Washington Times, a very conservative newspaper. The purpose probably was to give U.S. officials more ammunition to use against China, helping the administration retain its control in the coming election. I certainly hope the deal materializes, though it seems to me that a gas pipeline would be better than transporting liquified natural gas. Couldn't a gas pipeline follow the old silk road into China, or are there too many unfriendly neighbors along the way? Art

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next