Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zeta1961 who wrote (36231)	3/23/2004 1:40:38 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) of 793958

Nadine, I guess what I meant to say is that his actions have not been conducive to peace...and neither the Palestinians'...imo, they each seem to not want to "go there" as if being in turmoil is all they know...peace...uncharted territory challenging inbred paradigm of an eye for an eye mentality...So imo, both are at fault. You might accuse Sharon of this (personally, I think it's a bum rap even for Sharon), but who was Prime Minister in September 2000 when Sharon took his little walk? Ehud Barak, the most dovish PM in Israeli history, who together with Bill Clinton, offered Arafat 95% (+ swaps) of the territories, and got a terror war for a counter-offer. If Arafat didn't like Sharon, maybe he shouldn't have elected him. The Israelis are ready to make a peace. BUT, they are not ready to commit suicide, either individually or nationally.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next