Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (185512)	3/26/2004 2:59:46 AM
From: boris_a	Read Replies (2) of 1571685

ted, re conservatives in the vein of JF and are as angry as he is with the Bush administration. I hope that's it and not that these guys are worried that the Bush administration is capable of things that would be very bad for this country and its democracy. Clarke stated that he is extremely worried that the administration (Iraq2) acts in favour of Al-Q and terrorism. O'Neil obviously thinks the administration is catastrophe for state finance. It's unusual that such ranks turn on so heavily, isn't it? nytimes.com GWB: "Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the American people," Mr. Bush said to a burst of applause." But did Washington really want to know? (9/11 was a political god's gift for the NeoCons. It's more than they ever dreamed.) "The White House announced late Thursday that Ms. Rice was willing to appear before the panel again, but only in private and not under oath." Interesting. "Only in private and not under oath." Washington is very nuanced when it comes to find the truth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next