"changing the subject" << here I address your comment about being quoted, which you petulantly won't explain, but you respond with "changing the subject".
I certainly had only begun to gather a small fraction reference material as Solon has put down in this forum. And the response to Solon's efforts has been your reversion to wordplay, dissembly, and tautology. As I said,
FOR WHAT PURPOSE?
...would I engage you on these points?
As I previously wrote, to work hard (many hours on the Berkeley campus) and "chromeplate a mosquito" is not a noteworthy endeavor. Not here, not now.
How easy is it, to just "dismiss" the other person's presentation in this forum?? Or, IGNORE IT??!! I looked back to find your quote, and you have failed miserably to address the positions within ten, twenty, more... so many of Solon's posts. I am empathetically speculating that you must feel you are doing "valiant verbal swordplay against the anti-Christ forces" here on this thread, but it is not so. You've FAILED. It's like getting a bucket of water and a big paintbrush, and "painting" the sidewalk! You certainly will have the sore muscles to "prove you painted". But nothing has or will come of it!! All your points invariably distill to "faith" that some person(s) 1900 years ago was "truthful" and their work "truthfully copied". Which is all a non-factor when information about JC amply display his non-divinity in the final tally. |
