Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (127612)	3/28/2004 5:47:52 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 281500

No....my point is that there were a lot of things that could have been done by the Bush administration and weren't True, just like the Clinton adminstration. Of course, if everybody knew then what they know now, it would have been different. BUT, if it HAD been different, it would have included a pre-emptive war on the Al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan, and by extension against the Taliban, since they were as we know now quite coopted by Al Qaeda. What would you have said about a pre-emptive invasion of Afghanistan? And when the Sept 11th attacks ocurred anyway (it's frankly doubtful that anything Bush could have done would have 'shaken the trees' enough to stop them), would you have been in the chorus of people acussing Bush of "increasing the hate" and triggering the attacks? Lots of people want more to have been done only after the seriousness of the threat is clear-cut and proven. As you said, by then it's too late...yet, Bush's attempt to apply this argument to Iraq was rejected by the same people now demanding that he should have done more against Al Qaeda in the first few months of his administration.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next