SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (1630)3/28/2004 11:58:18 PM
From: Rock_nj  Read Replies (1) of 1715
 
Feel free to save it. Ten years is a very long time. I don't even know if I'll be alive in ten years.

It's not that I believe in any convoluted conspiracy theories surrounding cold fusion (although there's no doubt that the powers that be that control the U.S. government certainly haven't been hospitable to cold fusion, not that they're being conspiractorial about it, they're just disinterested in advancing the field by official government means like funding for research or other intellectual support. They have completely ignored cold fusion since it was written off in 1989, you can't even get a cold fusion patent approved in the U.S., despite the fact that many have been issued in Europe and Asia).

I follow the developments in alt.energy (cold fusion being one of them) and the fact is that 1,000s of positive cold fusion reports have been compiled over the past 15 years. Cold fusion is becoming more and more reproducible as more research into the phenomenon is conducted and the process that causes the cold fusion effect is better understood. It was easy for mainstream science to ignore such positive cold fusion reports for years. But even the U.S. Navy admits they were interested enough in cold fusion to do their own research secretly and last year they released an official report stating that they believe the cold fusion effect is real and warrants further study. Mainstream science can't ignore credible reports like that forever. That's exactly why the DOE is now agreeing to review their staunch anti-cold fusion position that they've held for years. Because, the experimental evidence in favor of cold fusion is starting to mount to the point where it can no longer be ignored.

You can read about the U.S. Navy cold fusion research and report in New Scientist.

March 29, 2003 - New Scientist
Eight-page article by Bennett Daviss about the U.S. Navy's 2002 two-volume cold fusion report, "Thermal and Nuclear Aspects of the Pd/D2O System: A Decade of Research at Naval Laboratories."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News