SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (127712)3/29/2004 8:46:24 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
>>"There have been no attacks against Americans ON US SOIL, arguably because the Islamic militants are being required to exert their efforts towards thwarting the US move into their backyard."<<

Let's see.......with the exception of Oklahoma City, we had no attacks "ON US SOIL" in 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 and 2000 and if I recall correctly we did some damage to the Serbs during that time which "arguably" explains why we have had no Serb attacks "ON US SOIL" during that time.

Now since we did not invade any Islamic states in 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 and 2000 what "arguably" prevented Islamic militant attacks "ON US SOIL" in those years?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News