Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sig who wrote (127889)	3/30/2004 9:48:11 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Hi Sig; Re: "911 would have occurred anyway, it was in the cards and not the fault of either Clinton or Bush." I agree. Nor do I have any real problems with most of the administration's efforts against terrorism. My complaint (and largely Clarke's complaint as well) is that *Bush shouldn't have gone into Iraq.* From my point of view, that was not an effort against terrorism, it was instead an ill conceived adventure that they hoped was going to have an effect not on terror per se, but instead on the Middle East in general. They were probably driven to do this because they had little use for the US military (our strongest foreign asset) in the "war" on terror. Like the engineers say, the guy whose only tool is a hammer tends to think that all problems are nails. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next