Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (127982)	3/31/2004 5:10:40 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Some complain that Bush is not tough enough on terrorism, and complain about the high costs. Here is the Office 0f Homeland Security ,which is going to be fairly tough on terrorists and costs $18 bil whitehouse.gov The war on terror is just beginning,with much to learn,and is therefore a form of experiment,including Iraq. And yet the Public asks for schedules and costs as though some seer can produce those. Could we convince the Pakistanis to go where no government has gone for 50 years, and raid remote villages.? Apparently so, and we learn from that what it takes to root out terrorists in rough terrain- their own stomping grounds. The final question is can the USA go the distance,pay the price, stay the course, when we have often failed in the past.. My hope is that it will not take any more major strikes like the one in Spain to be convincing. Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next