SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (3435)4/3/2004 11:41:30 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (4) of 116555
 
Let's get to the bottom of these employment lies if we can.
bls.gov

Let's start with total employment stats on page 7 ....
Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age
Employed ...... unadjusted 137,384 137,691
Employed ........ adjusted 138,301 138,298


Unadjusted we gained 307,00 jobs February to March so they say. From the same line adjusted we see that we lost 3,000 jobs!
WTF?
They use the higher of unadjusted or adjusted whatever suits their purpose? What a crock of BS. But let'd dig deeper.
From the same table
Unemployment rate ...... 5.6 5.7

Unemployment went up

Now Check out table A-5 on page 10 ....
This is fun
Table A-5. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status
Part time for economic reasons ..... adjusted 4,437 4,733
Part time for economic reasons ... unadjusted 4,764 4,868


People working part time for economic reasons skyrocketed by over 296,000 Jobs between February and March seasonally adjusted, and over 104,000 unadjusted..

Table A-8 on page 13 is interesting as well.
Table A-8. Unemployed persons by reason for unemployment
Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs
seasonally adjusted ...... 4,323 4,607
unadjusted ............... 4,888 4,920

So we created 307,000 jobs and unemployment went up by 284,000 seasonally adjusted and 32,000 unadjusted

Lets look at newly unemployed, also on page 13
Table A-9. Unemployed persons by duration of unemployment
Less than 5 weeks seasonally adjusted .......2,468 2,589
Less than 5 weeks unadjusted ................2,318 2,413

Newly unemployed went up by 121,000 adjusted
Newly unemployed went up by 95,000 unadjusted

Let's look at total non-farm payrolls on page 16
Note that these are all PRELIMINARY numbers

Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail
Total nonfarm ..... preliminary unadjusted 128,794 129,801
Total nonfarm ....... preliminary adjusted 130,240 130,548

WTF???
UNADJUSTED we gained 100,700 jobs
ADJUSTED we supposedly gained 308,000 jobs

How can this possibly jive with Table A-1?

Let's look at Average Hours worked on page 19
Table B-2. Average weekly hours of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail

Total private ..... unadjusted 33.8 33.5
Total private ....... adjusted 33.8 33.7


Average work week declined by .3 unadjusted and .1 adjusted

On to a big key as to whether or not the FED can hike...
Average hourly wages on page 20
Table B-3. Average hourly and weekly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail

Total private weekly wages adjusted ..... $527.28 $520.93
Total private weekly wages unadjusted ... $524.58 $523.70

Thus the average worker is taking home $6.35 less per week adjusted and $.88 less per week unadjusted. Certainly no wage inflation for sure.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext