SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12081)4/4/2004 8:35:23 AM
From: lorneRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
calculatedRisk. You said....." This is one of the blunders of the Bush administration: they conflated nuclear weapons with mustard gas. Blix is referring to mustard gas, anthrax and some other biological / chemical weapons.

What weapons did sadam use to murder thousands of his countrymen?

We had a small taste of what anthrax can do.

And the most dangerous of all...biological weapons. Just how much of this stuff is needed to murder thousands of innocent people? A test tube full? maybe a gym bag? how much is dangerous to the USA and other free countries.

As you said...." Blix is referring to mustard gas, anthrax and some other biological / chemical weapons.".....

Blix and the UN and the rest of the world thought these things are there and may still be there. How would you feel if a islam terrorist got hold of some biological stuff and released it in your city.

Should a president of the USA just put the threat of terrorists using biological weapons on a likely % basis. Only 10 % should we do something? how about 20 %. maybe 50 % should be the take action mark?

Sept. 11 should have proven to all Americans and all of the free world that islam terrorists will use whatever weapon they can get their hands on...what ever will murder the maximum amount of innocent people. so far it has been explosives BUT what IF.

IMO the president of the USA took the right action in disrupting the middle East. Changes for the better have already resulted in the middle east. Although at times I feel that the loss of just one American or innocent life by going after these islam terrorists scum is to big a price to pay.

This President made the most unpopular choice by going after islam terrorists where they live but the job of an American President is to protect Americans FIRST. If it means losing his/her job...so be it.

I find it strange beyond belief that democrats would use as an excuse the actions of their own president who was trying to protect American lives as a political argument to gain office.

I understand there is NO convincing fanatic democrats and others.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext