Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (37896)	4/5/2004 11:42:51 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 793953

"History shows that Clinton had eight years to take out Bin Laden and didn't do it. Bush had eight months and didn't do it." Bush actually had a lot less than 8 months...... TALKING BACK ....<font size=4>This administration<font size=3> came into office to discover that al Qaeda had been allowed to grow into a full-blown menace. It <font size=4>lost six precious weeks to the Florida recount – and then weeks after Inauguration Day to the go-slow confirmation procedures of a 50-50 Senate. As late as the summer of 2001, pitifully few of Bush’s own people had taken their jobs at State, Defense, and the NSC.<font size=3> Then it was hit by 9/11. And now, now the same people who allowed al Qaeda to grow up, who delayed the staffing of the administration, who did nothing when it was their turn to act, who said nothing when they could have spoken in advance of the attack – these same people accuse George Bush of doing too little? There’s a long answer to give folks like that – and also a short one. And the short one is:<font size=4> How dare you?<font size=3> Message 19964515 No doubt thess facts will fall on a lot of deaf ears.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next