Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (6695)	4/5/2004 2:19:06 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 15987

Of course it's greater danger, Hawk. I should have thought that was obvious. Obvious? Only to you... Those troops are extremely likely to have some other higher priorities than the safety of Israelis, such as their own safety for example. Again.. you're thinking along the lines of a non-combatant peace-keeping mission. I'm talking about providing them a ROE that includes using force against any party (including the Israelis) should they target one another. I'm talking about using NATO forces as an interim Palestinian security and police force until such time as a credible internal force has been created and deployed (as in Iraq). I hardly see how that could make the Israelis "less secure". But it's never going to happen, so why should we worry about it? Never say never... Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next