Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (38161)	4/6/2004 12:37:15 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) of 793983

The official said he found the lack of bin Laden and al Qaeda references in the final Clinton terror assessment interesting, but downplayed such "word-counting games." "We don't measure progress or response [to terrorism] by how many speeches, words, utterances or meetings were held on a particular issue, but by action taken," he said. The official found Clinton's terror assessment "interesting"????? Me too! Bin laden should have been taken out or captured when Clinton had the chance. Evidentially his administration didn't take the threat that bin laden....and al queda.......posed seriously enough or they would have done just that. Just as they would have furiously stressed the importance of searching for and eliminating the threat from al queda in that final report to congress AND to the new administration when it took office in Jan 01. There is an obvious discrepancy here. I hope Senator Gorton picks up on it during Ms Rice's testimony on Thursday. M

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next