Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (128780)	4/9/2004 12:40:52 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (3) of 281500

<<<You are making the same mistake Rice made...we couldn't do anything because we did not have specific details. What does she want...the flight number and the hyjacker's name? There is a LOT we could have done to prevent the attack without specific details. How many of the attacks would have been successful if all the planes had hardened cockpit doors? If we can't do anything to protect ourselves without specific info as to their plans why have we made all the changes to airline security? Why do we inspect luggage on flights without specific threats?? Should we leave the doors unlocked without a specific threat? >>> Thats all true but costs money and causes inconvienience, complaints and delays. Now after the Spanish train problems we can do the same with trains, busses, and cruise ships. The Government would be considered negligent not to implement major changes which they are doing. But America has been too successful, too many assets to protect, including oil field workers in SA. Make a list: Over 100 nuclear plants nukepills.com Refineries LNG storage tanks and tankers City water reservoirs Dams Airports and countless more. So chase down the villians -aggressively Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next