SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?*

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: carreraspyder4/9/2004 9:56:17 AM
   of 30916
 
AT&T RING DING

By STEPHEN LYNCH
newyork.post

April 9, 2004 -- AT&T could owe nearly $1 billion, and face years of costly litigation, under a decision the FCC is considering about telephone access fees.

For two years, AT&T has not paid interconnection fees to local phone companies when it used Internet lines to transfer the calls. The long-distance provider now expects the Federal Communications Commission to rule that it is required to pay those charges.

As to whether AT&T would owe those fees retroactively, a source close to the FCC said the commission probably won't address that issue. "But by not saying anything, it opens up AT&T to litigation," the source said.

It's hard to say how much AT&T would owe local phone companies. In a filing, AT&T said it was a possible cost, but gave no estimate.

Verizon said it has not been tracking the number. SBC estimated the total it is owed by AT&T and other long-distance carriers is between $250 million and $450 million.

Considering most of that amount would be accounted for by the long-distance giant, and assuming other local operators arrive ata similar figure, AT&T could be on the hook for nearly $1 billion.

An AT&T spokeswoman accused the FCC of splitting hairs with its decision.

In February, the commission ruled that voice-over-Internet calls that start and terminate on a computer network are exempt from fees. In AT&T's case, voice traffic was routed through Internet lines, but began and ended on traditional phone networks.

"Our position is it doesn't matter," said Larry Plumb, a spokesman with Verizon, who opposed AT&T's petition to the FCC. "They could have been bounced off the moon, it's still a phone call, and here's the price that applies."

AT&T has been battered by local-telephone operators of late. The carriers have stolen more of their long-distance and high-speed Internet access business, and Verizon recently knocked AT&T off the Dow Jones industrial average.

If Verizon hits AT&T with a bill for hundreds of thousands of dollars, it could add injury to insult.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext