SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (1790)4/9/2004 12:32:16 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (50) of 35834
 
Hugh Hewitt is not too happy either about the way
the "Times" is treating Kerry. - From: LindyBill

Lileks does a much better number on John Kerry's incoherence than I did yesterday. Perhaps it helps to have a three-year old who won't eat her grapes.

If so, then we need to get Adam Nagourney and Carl Hulse twin toddlers, because <font size=4>their New York Times' account of the political implications of the fighting in Iraq is lousy reporting and writing. The Timesmen pass lightly over Kerry's many incoherent statements from his NPR and CNN interviews yesterday --statements that should sound alarms among any serious observers of the war on terror.

Kerry is uttering nonsense, and there is no way to
disguise it, so the freindlies aren't reporting it. Rather
than treat the readers of the world's most influential
newspaper to Kerry's strange commentary on al-Sadr, the
reporters actually bother to devote two paragraphs to
quoting a Pat Buchanan column, as well as take-aways from
Bill O'Reilly and Newt Gingrich. Did the editors take a
day off? John Kerry is the Democratic nominee and he is
mouthing inanities on the most pressing issue of the day,
and the New York Times isn't mentioning the key excerpts
much less quoting them at length?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext