Our problem is not with the Iraqis who want to talk. It's with the Iraqis who want to fight.
Oh Carl, Carl, Carl...
Might I suggest that you may have gotten the cartesian cart before the equine equations here?
The problem (and I can assure you it is not one I share:), as I see it, is the lack of adequate data points by which you can determine the mass of the inertial Talkers vs the mass of your motive Fighters.
I know. I know. Your esteemed theory resorts to the well known and highly respected assumption that the potential force of these two factors is relatively equivalent to those of the suggested examples of Algeria and Vietnam. This is understandable, but as you well know it remains... inconclusive.
Indeed, when considered in light of the recent advancements in Loose String Theory, one can easily see potential violations of the space time continuum in your calculations.
In the first instance, your comparative ratios fail to account for the efficient removal of Fighters and potential Fighters, by the prior stupidities of the late Saddam administration. The have you compared his efficiency to those of the French who preceded "us" in your exemplars? But this is just one of the variations in the spiral of history which could produce error in your calculations.
Then too, the political basis underlying your projected unsuccessful outcome in Iraq, is teetering on the edge of an abyss. Indeed your political operatives are unable to manage a Unified Field Theory wherein they can both condemn a failure to foresee the WTC horror, and yet proclaim the wisdom of a future course which offers no more than the chance to sit and wait for the potential irradiation which is to come. ...What is it you numerologists say about probabilities, large complex systems, and things which may go wrong ...going wrong? <Hoo><"LOL!!"><Hoo>
But still, they insist on stuffing this garbage down my throat; expecting me to disgorge a Presidential pellet as an award for their efforts. ...I don't think so.
Whatever potential political basis you might be relying upon is rapidly being frittered away by defeatist Democratic offerings and the new UnAmerican Committee For Sedition. Who, by all appearances, are bound and determined to demonstrate once more exactly why it is that political opposition has long been said halt at the nation's shoreline.
Come to think of it ...unless I am mistaken... you have not even defined the point at which success devolves into failure. Just how long do you expect to be able to continue asserting that this focal point arrived in March of 2003?
Further, and despite your protestations at the sight of much death, you have failed to present a certified whole number which the publicans are currently unwilling to pay to avoid collision with your alternate universe of an Iranian Iraq.
Moreover, thanks to the apparent efficiencies of the New And Improved Prime Time Military Police Force, time may in fact be working against you. For unless your hefty assumptions regarding the conversion of Talker masses into Fighter energies prove true... your equations may soon be missing a critical element.
In sum just let me say this. There are innumerable Free Radicals sticking out of your equations Carl, and the negative numbers you expect them to produce have not yet been written. For my part, I have learned not to count such chickens before they hatch. <Hoo?>
I will however endeavor to remember these pre-mature expectorations of yours, and to remind you of same at an appropriate point in the now undiscovered future. Should it be absolutely necessary. ...Which I doubt.
But you just never know. ...What with all the Loose Strings, prions, alzheimers, mad cow, and so on. <Hoo><Hoo>
0|0 |
