SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (13589)4/9/2004 11:16:17 PM
From: Brumar89Read Replies (1) of 81568
 
Yes, it is a defense of Saddam's government to insist Iraq had no involvement in the 1st WTC bombing in light of the fact that 1) Ramzi Yousef used fake documents inserted into Kuwait's records during the period of Iraqi occupation to escape, 2) Saddam's government supplied one of the bombers with sanctuary and a government job after his escape from the US (a violation of UNSC Res 687), and 3) the 1993 attack was timed to coincide closely with the second anniversary of Iraq's defeat in the first Gulf war. These are all evidences of Iraqi government invovlement either before or after the fact or both. For you to dismiss it out of hand is a defense of Saddam's government. And that is despicable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News