SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (14346)4/13/2004 8:46:58 AM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (2) of 81568
 
The idea that the US and Bush is the problem is a pipe-dream.

With the terrorists, the US is certainly a problem and it does not matter since the terrorists should be eliminated. All the countries in the world are a problem with the terrorists.

But Iraq has nothing to do with terrorism. We are talking about Iraq. Previous US Presidents dis not have a Iraq problem. Even Bush Sr. went into Desrt Storm with a very stated purpose, accomplished it and got out. This President does not know why he is in Iraq. he started off by saying because of WMDs, then he said to eliminate Saddam because he has AQ links, then he said to eliminate Saddam because he is brutal to his people, and now he has come to rest at the establishment of democracy. So he goes in with one stated purpose and ends up with another after going through a series of them. Since he has no exit strategy, since he cannot state whom he is going to hand power over to, the Iraqis have lost faith in him and they have risen in arms. Al Sadr would not have succeeded if Bush was popular with the Iraqis. Al Sadr is not a terrorist like Osama. He has been thrown p as a leader by those who are disgruntled with this long US presence which to them seems to be going no where.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext