SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (39347)4/14/2004 9:56:32 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) of 793840
 
There was no need to skip the thread this morning. The thread was pretty quiet about the press conference.

I didn't watch the whole thing, just popped in a couple of times. I saw a bit of the speech, towards the middle, and I saw the first question. Re the speech, it looked to me like he was reading something he saw for the first time ten minutes before air time. Re the first question, I thought he did a good job staying even in the face of a baiting question. At neither time did I see any smirk, which I appreciated.

I just finished reading the transcript. The transcript was odd in that the speech part, which he was reading, had a number of obvious grammatical errors. I could understand finding them in the Q and A but in the speech?

I thought the speech was OK but not significant enough to warrant pre-emption of AI. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News