SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tsigprofit who wrote (9216)4/14/2004 12:17:13 PM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Mejia post continued..refusal to be killed..

> To make matters worse, Mejia found his officers to be glory-obsessed and
> intentionally reckless with the safety of their men. In particular, he
> says, they wanted the Army's much-coveted Combat Infantry Badge-an award
> bestowed only on those who have met and engaged the enemy. "To be a
> twenty-year career infantry officer and not have your CIB is like being a
> chef and having never cooked or being a fireman and never having put out a
> fire," Mejia says. "These guys were really hungry, and we were the bait."
> In one attempt to draw enemy fire, Mejia's company-about 120 guys divided
> evenly into four platoons-was ordered to occupy key intersections in
> Ramadi, a notoriously violent Iraqi city, for several days running. "All
> the guys were really nervous. This was a total violation of standard
> operating procedure. They train you to keep moving, not sit in the open."
> Finally the enemy attacked, and a platoon in Mejia's company took
> casualties.
> When the troops were ordered to perform the exact same maneuvers again,
> Mejia refused. "I told them, I quit." Luckily for him the four staff
> sergeants of the platoon that had taken casualties also refused to go out.
> Technically, refusing an order in a combat situation can be charged as
> mutiny. But in a tense meeting with their commanding officer, the staff
> sergeants negotiated a new plan of action that allowed the GIs to vary the
> timing and movement of their patrols. After these changes, Mejia agreed to
> go. "We went out two hours earlier than usual, and because of that we
> caught these young guys setting an IED (improvised explosive device) of
> three mortars wrapped together." If Mejia's squad had set out according
> the Commanding Officers' original plan, he believes that some of the guys
> in his squad would have been killed. For its part, the Florida National
> Guard claims that Mejia was a bad sergeant and that he was not aggressive
> enough in engaging what all admit is a highly elusive enemy.
> Spc. Oliver Perez, who served with Mejia, disagrees. "I fought next to him
> in many battles. He is not a coward," said Perez, who has also said he
> will testify on Mejia's behalf if the Army proceeds with a court-martial.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext