SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who started this subject4/14/2004 3:13:27 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (50) of 35834
 
Misery Loves Kerry

Nonsense index.

John Kerry can't even do misery right.

Since the 1960s, economists and politicians have taken America's economic temperature using the "Misery Index," adding the rate of unemployment to the rate of inflation. It's a simple and illuminating snapshot of the economy, and was used to devastating effect by Ronald Reagan in 1980, when Jimmy Carter was president and the Misery Index was close to 21 percent.
<font size=4>
The M.I. is an excellent tool for any politician challenging an incumbent in a weak economy. And since, as John Kerry & co. keep telling us, this is the worst economy since WWII/The Depression/The Dark Ages, why wouldn't the Kerry campaign want to highlight the current state of misery?

And so with great fanfare, John Kerry released his "Middle Class Misery Index" to great media fanfare. It's Reagan vs. Carter all over again. One glance at Kerry's Middle Class Misery Index proves beyond all doubt that the American economy is in the tank, that the Bush economic policy is a disaster, and that it's time for a change.
<font size=5>
Only one problem. It's not the "Misery Index."
<font size=4>
Instead of simply adding the unemployment rate to the
inflation rate, Kerry has come up with what he claims is
a "Misery Index" specifically for the middle class. In so
doing, Kerry is echoing potential veep John Edwards's
claim that there are two Americas, one that's happy,
prosperous, and well adjusted, and one that votes Democrat.

The Kerry Index O' Misery combines median family income, college tuition, health costs, gasoline cost, bankruptcies, the homeownership rate, and private-sector job growth. Coincidentally (?), six of these seven economic trends have gone the wrong way during the Bush presidency. Only home-ownership rates have improved.

Kerry argues that these measurements — in particular median family income — are the true measure of America's economic fortunes. "Less noted, but perhaps even more important, is the fact that middle-class families are increasingly being squeezed by the rising cost of health care, college tuition, and gasoline at the same time that wages and incomes are stagnating and personal bankruptcies are at record levels," reads part of Kerry's report.

Nobody would disagree that expensive gasoline and health-care costs are bad news, or that fewer bankruptcies would be a good thing. But in addition to the fact that, adjusted for inflation, the price of gas is relatively low, is it any better a measure of the health of the middle class than, say, food prices? Rent prices? The cost of clothing?
<font size=5>
A fair-minded person could put together an economic index
using these three indicators, along with net tax rates,
new business starts, the Dow Jones average, and home-
equity values and get a completely different result. What
would it prove?
<font size=4>
This is why, since the Johnson administration, the "Misery
Index" has been a combination of the two most broad and
important indicators: unemployment and inflation; Do you
have a job and how much is your paycheck really worth?

So if the Kerry campaign is right and the American economy
is awash in misery, why not stick with the basics? Why go
through these economic contortions?

Because, as is so often the case with John Kerry, the
numbers don't add up.

As the Wall Street Journal pointed out on their editorial-
page earlier this week, the real "Misery Index" today is
at an all-time election-year low. In 1980, the M.I. was
20.6 percent. In 1996, during the boom years of Bill
Clinton, it was at 8.4 percent. The average M.I. in
America since World War II has been above 9 percent.

And how miserable is the American economy today?
Unemployment is at 5.7 percent, inflation is at 2.0
percent, giving us a "Misery Index" of 7.7 percent.

We have a winner!

This number, it should be remembered, is the real M.I.
before new job growth is factored in. If the first-quarter
job-growth trend continues, and the economy does add
200,000 jobs a month for the rest of the year, the "Misery
Index" will fall even lower before Election Day.

The fundamental battle over the economy between an
incumbent and a challenger is whether the glass is half
full or half empty. Using the traditional "Misery Index,"
the American economy is overflowing.

What will John Kerry talk about now?
<font size=3>

— Radio-talk-host Michael Graham is an NRO contributor.

nationalreview.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext