Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (39467)	4/15/2004 8:12:07 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) of 793925

Thanks for the link. I read the document in it's entirety. There is nothing in it that I disagree with. More than that I agree with it whole heartedly. How deadly force is to be applied is not detailed in this document - (and there is no reason why it should be). But you as a lawyer will know (better than most people), there is a lot of wiggle room for the execution of this strategy. I fully believe that we can achieve the objectives of this strategy without changing our core values. In fact, I am absolutely certain that the only way we can achieve the objectives of this document is if we maintain our core values. After all, what is it all about? What are we fighting for, if not for our core values. You know as well as I do that many who beleive in our use of deadly force, know nothing about our core values. Too many are in it to profit from war. Too many are in it because they lust for destruction - as if it were a video or football game. Finally, there are those that are angry, for reasons they themselves don't know, and war somehow satisfies this anger. As we continue this discussion, I begin to appreciate and undnerstand our core values ever more so.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next