go ahead and answer the question....
motivating a nation to go to war under the false pretense that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction and that there was a connection to Al Queada.
charges that the government has not proved and furthermore, the so called 'evidence' they said they had, is, at best dubious, if not outright false and fabricated.
particularly when there could have been the possibility of additional pressure via the United Nations and IF the need to go to war was still there, then the real coallition would have been a smarter strategy.
that's for starters... however...
it is all out there for you to see. [without your rose colored glasses of course]
and this is all you get.
I asked you the question first.
where in my post you responded to, says I hate bush and I worship clintoris.
unlike you I am busy, and i won't spend more time with an individual like you who 'thinks' you can demand a specific question answered, has sufficient hypocrisy to levy baseless charges, and has the discourtesy to answer a question, yet demands that his question be answered.
as i said, you are nothing more than an irrational imbecile, or else, you would not write the stupidity that you do.
you are mistaken making the assumptions you have made about me. THAT is even further proof of your imbecility.
don't post to me any more. i dislike people like you.
ciao bambino |