SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: quehubo who wrote (129568)4/19/2004 6:26:14 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Que, when I see the "going forward" cliche, and accusations of my being ignorant, my eyes glaze over. "Policy agenda going forward" - huh?

Iraqi oil essential today for a stable oil price? Of course. The question is, how high would the price at the pump or well-head go if Iraq's oil was shut down tomorrow?

I don't think we'd see $100 a barrel.

Of the world's energy consumption, including all forms, what proportion is Iraq's supply? Not much. I suppose I should get BP's energy statistics out, but I know it's not much. I guess about 2%. I can cut my energy consumption by half without breaking into a sweat.

Personally, I think it served a lot of interests, such as BP's, Shell's and Exxon's among others, to have Iraq's oil off the market, or severely limited, for most of a decade. That made BP's reserves worth a lot more. BP's profits have been great for a decade. A pumpathon would have been very bad for BP's profits.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext