SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (6036)4/19/2004 10:17:12 AM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (2) of 20039
 
<<<As I said, no airplanes ever hit anything on Sept 11, 2001.>>>

Considering both hits on the WTC were caught on tape, it's pretty hard to justify any theory that does not include airplanes. While the Pentagon hit is less well documented, there was airplane debris all over the place. Likewise, there was airplane debris all over the place from flight 93.

FYI: THEORY - A closely reasoned set of propositions derived from and supported by established evidence and intended to serve as an explanation for a group of phenomena.

The problem with the "no airplane" theory is the evidence does not support it and "closely reasoned" does not enter the picture at all. We saw airplanes hit the buildings and we saw fireballs consistent with large quantities of airplane fuel igniting. There are things you can do with missiles and high explosives, but sticking 30 tons of fuel on a missile smaller than the space shuttle or making high explosives create huge orange fireballs are not on the list.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext