SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Srexley who wrote (566356)4/19/2004 9:39:46 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
<<Then why are you trying?>>

You were making fun of effective rates as if they weren't a real metric. (You were also using grammar as if you were illiterate.) I pointed you to some useful data that might help you in your debate with Buddy. Instead of thanking me you called me a dolt. I guess that's just the kind of person you are.

<<No, I don't. These are actual tax filers.>>

Plenty of people file when they're unemployed or only worked part of the year. So the fact that we've lost 3 million or so jobs has to be a factor in less people owing income tax.

<<You are continuing the LIE that the demos scream till they are blue in the face that the tax cuts were only for the rich.>>

You're the one who keeps repeating the lie, doesn't make it true, or you honorable though.

Who claims the cuts only go to the rich? Show me where i've said that? Show me where on John Kerry's site or on the DNC's site that it says only the rich got tax cuts under Bush. Show me Rex.

<<It really is disgusting to see it repeated over and over by the blind followers like you.>>

Since i've never said it, you just reveal yourself to be a liar and a very dishonest debater. But again, i guess that's just the kind of person you are.

If you want to read some analysis about how the Bush tax cuts go mostly to the rich, you can read about it here:

cbpp.org

<<Do you really think that the unemployment rate going from roughly 4.5% to roughly 6% would make the filers paying ZERO in Fed INCOME tax go from 23% to 33%?>>

Can you even back this info up? You said you saw it on tv or something and that it counted 2004 filers, which is impossible since we're in 2004. Do you have a link or a story to back you up?

Steve Dietrich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext