Re: Considering both hits on the WTC were caught on tape,...
LOL... You mean like Bin Laden "caught on tape" urging jihad, praising the alleged Arab hijackers, trashing America, and lately, offering Europe a truce??? You mean "caught on tape" like Colin Powell's evidence of Iraq's WMD caught on satellite pictures? Remember: they were all "CIA-authenticated" tapes... And when Powell fast-talked the UN Security Council into passing res 1441, DCI Tenet sat and nodded next to him...
Bottom line: those pictures and footages of airplanes hitting the WTC ARE NO EVIDENCE.
Of course, that's hard to admit... since it means that there is no "free media" --the media, the press, the networks are all at the beck and call of the powers that be, they are part and parcel of the media-military complex.
As for "There are things you can do with missiles and high explosives, but sticking 30 tons of fuel on a missile smaller than the space shuttle or making high explosives create huge orange fireballs are not on the list", suffice it to assume that the crew of "plumbers" who planted the mininukes at the WTC basement were all the more able to fit up the floors allegedly hit by the hijacked airliners. It shouldn't be that difficult for explosives specialists to stage a missile strike against a tower... and there was enough room in WTC offices to stow them with barrels of kerosene. What they were unable to do, however, is to squeeze Boeing engines or fuselage debris into the offices!! Hence the need to collapse the whole boodle....
Gus |
