Re: I await proof from you that the timing of the building collapses is known well enough to be able to say that the peak of those traces was reached BEFORE the collapse had completed.
Oh, that's easy.... just ask Cellular One and other cellphone service providers what happened that disrupted their wireless network in NYC on Sept 11, 2001 --ask for their debriefing/troubleshooting transcripts.
CLUE:
The 9/11 Disaster - The Myth and Reality
by Brian Desborough
conspiracyplanet.com
Extract:
...According to more than one American major television network, the impact arising from the aircraft crashing into the twin towers, dislodged the brittle fire retardant coating from the tower's structural steelwork. This allowed the steel floor beams to become exposed to the burning jet fuel, causing them to buckle under the intense heat and separate from their wall attachments. The weight of the collapsing upper floors caused a cascade failure of the lower floors, thus resulting in the total collapse of both towers.
This explanation is patently false. A perusal of video footage showing the initial collapse of the North Tower, clearly reveals the communications mast located atop the North Tower collapsing vertically downwards. The mast was mounted on top of a central service column which housed the elevators. This central service column in turn was supported on massive box-sectioned columns attached to the bedrock, which were fabricated from steel four inches thick. In order for the communications mast to fall vertically downwards, the steel columns supporting the entire central service column must have been severed, down in the basement area of the structure. Severing the steel columns would have caused the entire central service column to drop, thus rupturing the floor beam attachments and precipitating the collapse of the entire tower. In other words, the twin towers did not collapse due to aircraft impact, but because a highly skilled demolition team severed the steel columns in the basement of each tower.
Is there a smoking gun which validates the writer's claim? There certainly is; in fact more than one. After the calamitous disaster, it was found that the steel columns at the base of the elevator shafts had melted. A temperature of 2800 degrees Fahrenheit is necessary in order to melt structural steel. Even with an ample supply of oxygen, burning jet fuel only attains a temperature of a little over 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.
Moreover, burning plastic and furnishings inside the towers generated a great deal of black smoke, which was quite evident as it poured from broken windows. Soot particles in such smoke absorb a great deal of high energy free radicles which are liberated during such conflagrations. This chemical reaction is known as the "wall effect" and drastically lowers the temperature of the fire to about 500 degrees Fahrenheit. This is why it was physically impossible for burning jet fuel to have melted the steel columns, especially since falling debris from the collapsing floors would have resulted in the basement region of the towers being an oxygen-starved area.
The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory is situated some twenty one miles north of the World Trade Center. The laboratory's seismometers registered very minimal activity at the moment that the aircraft impacted the twin towers, yet recorded major seismic spikes at the commencement of each tower's collapse, before the falling debris began to impact the ground. Simultaneously, people evacuating the towers reported hearing explosions, and all cell phones in the vicinity momentarily went dead. These are additional smoking guns indicative that the central service columns of both towers had been deliberately severed.
The temporary interruption of the cell phone transmissions is a clear indication that a localized electromagnetic pulse was generated at the commencement of each tower's collapse. The seismic spikes occuring prior to the falling debris impacting the ground, are the characteristic signature of a ground-coupled nuclear explosion, the explosions heard as the towers collapsed are attributable to the high-explosive detonators used in the initiation of the nuclear reaction. The intense heat generated by such a thermonuclear explosion would not only melt the steel columns, but could also account for the large quanties of finely pulverized concrete, an anomaly not normally encountered when a large building is demolished.
There you have it, dear reader, the above smoking guns are a clear indication that nuclear explosions, not aircraft, collapsed the World Trade Center structures. In 1975, prolific writer John McPhee, who was educated at Princeton and Cambridge Universities, wrote the book "The Curve of Binding Energy." The book title is derived from a nuclear physics term for the mass which is converted into released energy during nuclear reactions. The book cites physicist Theodor Taylor discussing the miniaturization of nuclear weapons. Taylor disturbingly and very prophetically predicted that sometime in the future, terrorists could destroy the World Trade Center towers with nuclear weapons the size of a stick of chewing gum!...
©Brian Desborough
(all rights reserved) |
