SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MLNM)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Icebrg who wrote (2100)4/29/2004 1:21:02 PM
From: software salesperson  Read Replies (1) of 3044
 
04/29/04 cc notes

1.1 q results- - bate

V in Europe; V moderate growth in 2 q, with more dramatic growth in 2nd ½ based on apex;

I co-promotion % has been high and will continue throughout rest of year based on early acs trial expenses; I inventories are below target level

Cost reduction; non-gaap profit in 2006; 35 M milestone from jnj for Europe approval; sga will be somewhat higher throughout year

Campath royalty in 1 q; will receive modest royalties if over threshold in the future

3/31/04 cash = 838m ; convertible debt = 105 m

confirming 2004 guidance

2.progress against goals- - Levin

MM- -

V’s current label hits 25% of mm market; will file snda 2nd ½ 04 which will hit another 25% in 2nd line; p 4 frontline trial 4q 04/ 1 q 05 will hit the remaining 50%

Last week’s conference, there was a small frontline trial in turino, italy with V, T dex which produced a 74% response rate in 19 previously untreated mm patients

Asco - - (a) mm apex trial data; (b) update on ash frontline data for V alone and V + dex; (c) frontline data for V, dex and adriamycin

NHL- -

There was a ~ 50% response rate for mantle cell and follicular at ash

Started p 2 mantle cell for relapsed and refractory in 6/03

Plan 1st ½ 04 p2 V + rituximab for relapsed and refractory indolent nhl

2 investigator-initiated studies at asco: (a) relapsed follicular and mantle cell and (b) p2 relapsed indolent or aggressive nhl

SOLID - -ASCO

p 2 b nsclc- - V alone and V + taxotere; interim data

p 1 prostate cancer V + taxotere- - tolerability and activity of V

p2 colorectal- - V alone and V+ irinotecan (failed trial)

V alone and in combo for breast cancer

INTEGRILIN - - confirming guidance

Remove trial- - I with and without heparin in low risk patients; is heparin needed?

Protect trial- -to prove superiority of I over angiomax; data this year

Early acs trial 1st ½ 04 - - to demonstrate early use of I in high risk patients in accord with medical guidelines

Crusade study progressing

PIPELINE

3 molecules go/no go decision by end 2004

data asco p1/2 2704 prostate cancer- - enrolled in pilot 2 program

data asco 944 in solid tumors

data later this year 1202


3.Q&A

(i) what are your variable costs in r&d guidance? - - breadth of program development, i.e. how many indications, timing of programs and prioritization

(ii) what are the mantle cell enrollment #s? - - don’t comment on enrollment #s

(iii) re: turino, what were the doses in the combo V and T study? V= 1.3-1.7; T = 100 rising to 400 mg; V has no added toxicity to T

(iv) when mantle cell data? - - ash 04

(v) how much usage of V in 2nd line? - -V usage has primarily been 3rd line, consistent with label; increasing physician interest in earlier use as data comes in

(vi) I inventory levels? - - inventories down at wholesaler levels; doesn’t want fluctuating inventories

(vii) # typical V cycles ? - - 5-6

(viii) last I price increase? - - end of March 04

(ix) asco nsclc data? - - data from 1st stage group of patients ~ 50; by end of year, all data

(x) V off label use? - - after asco and ash, physician use typically picks up for cancer drugs; physicians want to see more data

(xi) Where is most of V use? - - tertiary care centers (majority) , teaching hospitals (next), community physicians( last)

(xii) Why waiting to start 1st line trial? - - figuring out best trial design; may be more than 1 trial

(xiii) Will V’s growth next q be a moderate 3%? - -no direct answer; apex will accelerate physicians’ confidence dramatically in 2nd ½ 04

(xiv) Is 15% the response rate hurdle for lung cancer the same as for colorectal? - - hurdle rate was never given out

(xv) If T is approved in 3 q, how will it affect you?- - don’t see T as competitive since they would have different labels

(xvi) Combo use with V? - - it’s been mainly dex, some T

(xvii) Do physicians adjust V dose? - - mainly consistent dose

(xviii) why different responses for nhls? - - they have different molecular pathways; V inhibits multiple pathways in cancer; there is no particular mutation

(xix) research estimates for 1st, 2nd, 3rd line use? - - no penetration rates to be given

(xx) V rollout in Europe? Pricing? - - no direct answer on price; jnj ready to go; initiation varies by country

(xxi) Preferred I inventory rate? - - 1 month

(xxii) Do you expect to pay milestone to 3rd party in 2004? - - no

(xxiii) Is 1 q r&d rate an accurate rate for the year? - - no direct answer

(xxiv) V data in ovarian? - - through cooperative group at end of year

(xxv) When will asco apex data be published? - - it’s a high profile study with a high priority

(xxvi) V wholesaler inventory levels? - - no direct answer

(xxvii) Compendia listing? - - if they have 2 publications, they will file for mm and nhl

(xxviii) Asco combo data? - - V, dex, adriamycin

4. impressions

management came off as flat; expenses way down; revenues down; analysts not buying a V revenue pickup after apex data will be released; unclear why I is off and how I revenue objective can be met by year-end; from last q’s call:

"4 q I sales were very strong; inventory drawdown with wholesalers in 4 q after earlier 4 q price increase; 3rd party audits say I sales were strong; drawdown reduced inventory levels by ½-3/4 months"

with 80 new I reps, not much progress

sales
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext