Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (130460)	4/29/2004 8:56:50 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>> Wait.. I thought the goal was for Iraqis to take over responsibility for their own security? No, the goal to destroy Iraq's ability to support Palestinians in their feeble attempt to fight back against Israel. For that purpose it is irrelevant whether it is accomplished by making a prosperous life for Iraqi's, so that they do not feel kinship with the hardship of the Palestinians. Or perhaps dividing the country into separate little provinces that would be in conflict, and therefore be un-able to render any support. Or maybe spark outright civil war, so that there would be no spare energy to expend elsewhere. All these scenarios are perfectly fine. Some have lower costs than others, but that is peripheral to the central purpose. >> Maybe you need to start reading some of the Iraqi blogs pervading the internet The boy whose arms and legs were blown off by the bomb the US dropped on his home, that killed his father, mother and 5 brothers and sisters cannot write any blogs. The blogs that do not acknowledge that event and 10,000 like it are just crap.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next