Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elsewhere who wrote (41391)	4/30/2004 12:48:29 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 793820

"My question was an indirect way of trying to convince him that the NYT isn't completely useless" JJ, my personal POV is that when a major player has established a clear pattern of bias, partisan behavior, half truths, lies, distortion or intentional deceit; they are not to be trusted to be accurate on anything they have abused in the past. The more persistent this pattern of behavior is, the wider the net I throw over the issues I will not trust them on. Instead, I will seek out independent verification. And I will not hesitate to speak out loudly against such behavior. I apologize if I was harsh in my replies to you last night. Sometimes I allow my personal views on dissembling/veracity/bias to get the best of me at times. I took your posts to be defending, what is to me, a discredited institution. I get frustrated when folks easily dismiss serious breaches of trust, morals &/or ethics. It just does not make sense to me at all. My bad :-\|

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next