SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: denizen48 who wrote (44250)4/30/2004 9:11:32 AM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
not sure what you're trying to saying.

Mr. Clinton went before the same 9/11 commission
as Bush, Cheney and a whole litany of people.
That's what I was talking about. His testimony
there was handled the same way as Bush and
Cheney. That's how these things are done.

Did you think the 9/11 commission was a grand jury?
It's certainly not (though some of those folks on it
perhaps think that's what they are<g>)

If you're actually referring to the Paula Jones matter,
Clinton testimony there was in a deposition in a civil
proceeding, under oath, and had nothing to do with a grand jury.
That's the only likely proceeding where he would
have been asked about his penis. (Of course, if
he had learned to keep it zipped, he needn't have
suffered that indignity.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News